Connecticut attorney record
Robert A Izzo
Robert A Izzo is an attorney registered with the Connecticut Judicial Branch (attorney registration) under bar number 370027, admitted in 1978. The current public license status is "Disbarred (05/09/2003)" as of 2026-06-13.
Current license status of record is disbarred.
The licensing authority's public record currently lists this attorney as disbarred. Review the disciplinary record below and confirm with the official source before relying on this listing.
A summary of the public record — not a rating of skill, not a recommendation, not legal advice.
Experience vs. active Connecticut attorneys
State median: 25 yrs
48 yrs admitted — more experience than ~100% of active Connecticut attorneys.
Years since admission, active Connecticut attorneys with a published admission year (n = 29,014). This attorney's band is highlighted.
License & registration
| Full name | Robert A Izzo |
|---|---|
| Bar / registration number | 370027 |
| License status | Disbarred official status of record: “Disbarred (05/09/2003)” |
| Admission year | 1978 |
| Law school | Not on record |
| Business location | Southington, CT |
| Firm | Not on record |
| Discipline standing | Current status reflects a disbarred record with the licensing authority. See “Disciplinary decisions on record” below for the itemized public orders. |
Disciplinary decisions on record
31 published attorney-discipline decisions of record match this attorney's name and disbarred standing of record.
- Date n/aAdditionally, since we are ordering that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate, and a presentment is a de novo proceeding, we order that the presentment complaint include an allegation that the Respondent's failure to attend the hearing, despite being served with a subpoena, violated Rules 8.1(2) and 8.4(4) of the RuIzzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, we order the Respondent presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, we order that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the court may deem appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAdditionally, this reviewing committee concludes by clear and convincing evidence that the Respondent violated Rule 8.1(2) of the Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to appear at the hearing before this reviewing committee after being duly served with a subpoena and orders that the presentment complaint include a violation of this rule since the presentment will be a trial de novo.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, since this reviewing committee concludes that the Respondent violated Rules 1.2(a), 1.3, 1.4(a) and (b), 1.5(a), 1.15(b), 1.16(d), 8.1(2) and 8.4(3) and (4) of the Rules of Professional Conduct and Practice Book �2-32(a)(1), we order that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the court may deem appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, we order that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aSince this reviewing committee orders that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for whatever discipline the court deems appropriate, and the presentment is a de novo proceeding, this reviewing committee orders that the presentment complaint include the following allegation of misconduct: the Respondent�s failure to attend the grievance hearing on June 5, 2002 despite being subpoenaedIzzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, we order that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, we order that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, since this reviewing committee concludes that the Respondent violated Rules 1.2, 1.3 and 8.4(3) of the Rules of Professional Conduct and Practice Book �2-32(a)(1), we order that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the court may deem appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aNotwithstanding, since we conclude that the Respondent violated Rules 1.3 and 1.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct and Practice Book �2-32(a)(1), we reprimand the Respondent.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/a� Finding the Respondent committed serious misconduct, exacerbated by his extensive grievance history, we order the Respondent presented to the Superior Court � for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aNontheless, since we are ordering that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate, and a presentment is a de novo proceeding, we order that the presentment complaint include a finding that the Respondent failed to attend the reviewing committee hearing, despite being served with a subpoena, in violation of Rules 8.1(2) anIzzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aThis reviewing committee finds the following violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct by clear and convincing evidence: The Respondent�s failure to communicate with the Complainant after being retained to pursue an Application for Naturalization constitutes a violation of Rule 1.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.� The Respondent�s failure to file an answer to the grievance complaint coIzzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aSince the presentment will be a de novo proceeding, it is further ordered that a charge be added for the Respondent�s failure to file an answer to the grievance complaint, as required by Practice Book �2-32(a)(1).Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aIt is the decision of this reviewing committee that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for whatever discipline the court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, since this reviewing committee concludes that the Respondent violated Rule 1.15 of the Rules of Professional Conduct and Practice Book ��2-27 and 2-32(a)(1), we order that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the court may deem appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aSince this reviewing committee orders that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for whatever discipline the court deems appropriate, and a presentment is a de novo proceeding, this reviewing committee also orders that the presentment complaint include the following allegations: the Respondent violated Rule 8.1(2) of the Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to respond to the StatewIzzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/a� Since we conclude that the Respondent violated the Rules of Professional Conduct and in the consideration of the seriousness of the misconduct, and the Respondent�s disciplinary history, we order that a presentment be filed against the Respondent in the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, we order the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aSince we are ordering that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate, and a presentment is a de novo proceeding, we order that the presentment complaint include a finding that the Respondent charged an unreasonable fee for a seller's closing in violation of Rule 1.5(a) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aIn light of the fact that this reviewing committee orders that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for whatever discipline the court deems appropriate, and a presentment proceeding is a de novo proceeding, this reviewing committee also orders that the presentment complaint include the following allegations: the Respondent�s failure to keep his client informed about the status of theIzzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, we order the Respondent presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAccordingly, we reprimand the Respondent.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/a� Finding the Respondent committed serious misconduct, exacerbated by his extensive grievance history, we order the Respondent presented to the Superior Court � for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aAdditionally, since we are ordering that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate, and a presentment is a de novo proceeding, we order that the presentment complaint include an allegation that the Respondent's failure to attend the hearing, despite being served with a subpoena, violated Rules 8.1(2) and 8.4(4) of the RuIzzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aIt is the recommendation of this reviewing committee that the Respondent be reprimanded by the Statewide Grievance Committee and that the Respondent be required to complete a continuing legal education course in law office management and a continuing legal education course in legal ethics within six months of the issuance of the final decision in this matter.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aSince a presentment is a de novo proceeding, this reviewing committee further recommends that the presentment complaint include an allegation that the Respondent violated Rule 1.4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to communicate with the Respondent or her son regarding the status of the criminal matter and failing to explain his absence at the Complainant's son's court hearing.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aSince we conclude that the Respondent violated Practice Book �2-32(a)(1), we reprimand the Respondent.Izzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aNontheless, since we are ordering that the Respondent be presented to the Superior Court for the imposition of whatever discipline the Court deems appropriate, and a presentment is a de novo proceeding, we order that the presentment complaint include a finding that the Respondent failed to attend the reviewing committee hearing, despite being served with a subpoena, in violation of Rules 8.1(2) anIzzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
- Date n/aIt is the further decision of the reviewing committee that the presentment, which will be a trial do novo, contain further charges, based on the Respondent�s misleading comments to both the Complainant and the court, that the Respondent engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, in violation of Rule 8.4(3), and made a false statement of material fact to a tribunalIzzo, Robert (Statewide Grievance Committee Complaint)
Source: Connecticut Statewide Grievance Committee attorney-discipline record (reviewing-committee grievance decisions imposing a reprimand/conditions or directing a presentment to the Superior Court, via the CT Judicial Branch SGC Grievance Decisions index; dismissals/no-discipline outcomes excluded by per-decision verification). These are official, published disciplinary records, linked verbatim. Matching is by name against attorneys whose roster status already reflects discipline — a name match, not a confirmed identity. Read each linked record for the controlling disposition.
Federal court activity
Federal court activity has not been compiled for this attorney yet.
Source & last updated
Source: Connecticut Judicial Branch (attorney registration) — official attorney record. As of 2026-06-13 (last roster ingest).
Frequently asked questions
Is Robert A Izzo a licensed attorney in Connecticut?
Robert A Izzo is registered with the Connecticut Judicial Branch (attorney registration) under bar number 370027. The current public license status of record is "Disbarred (05/09/2003)" as of 2026-06-13.
Has Robert A Izzo been disbarred or suspended?
Robert A Izzo's current license status of record is disbarred per the Connecticut Judicial Branch (attorney registration). 31 published disciplinary decisions of record match this name and standing of record; see the disciplinary decisions section for the itemized orders.
What is Robert A Izzo's bar number?
Robert A Izzo's Connecticut bar/registration number is 370027, assigned by the Connecticut Judicial Branch (attorney registration). A bar number is the most reliable way to confirm you have the right attorney, especially for common names.
When was Robert A Izzo admitted to practice law?
Robert A Izzo was admitted in 1978 — about 48 years since admission per the Connecticut Judicial Branch (attorney registration).
Where is Robert A Izzo's law office?
The Connecticut Judicial Branch (attorney registration) record lists a business location of Southington, CT for Robert A Izzo. Phone and email are not published in the public roster.
For attorneys
Is this your record?
Claim it to request corrections or add your practice details. Submit your info and we'll email you the verification steps right away — our team reviews claims within 1–2 business days.
This site republishes official public records and is not legal advice, a lawyer referral service, or a consumer reporting agency. Information here may not be used to make decisions about employment, tenancy, or credit (FCRA). Records are shown as published by their official sources and may contain errors or be out of date; consult the linked official source to verify. To correct or dispute a record, contact the licensing authority of record.